Chinmayi Sharma

Chinmayi Sharma

Call: Call: 2020; 2022 (India)

“Chinmayi's legal analysis is exceptional, but what stands out is her ability to apply that expertise practically, with full appreciation of the commercial context and the client's goals."

- The Legal 500 (2026)

“Chinmayi combines razor-sharp attention to detail with forensic rigour. She has the ability to dissect complex and tangled evidence..."

- The Legal 500 (2026)

"...Her abilities to identify precise legal issues and distil these into compelling skeleton arguments or oral submissions are outstanding.”

- The Legal 500 (2026)

“A clever and industrious junior, with a pleasant manner and easy to work with, Chinmayi is ferociously intelligent, and her drafting skills are of the highest standard.”

- The Legal 500 (2026)

"Chinmayi is absolutely first rate…She is a superb junior who gets across the details of a case…She is intelligent, thorough and hardworking…very considered and gives clear and commercial advice."

- Legal 500 UK Bar (2025)

Practice Overview

Chinmayi maintains a broad practice in commercial litigation and arbitration with a particular focus on civil fraud, banking and energy disputes. She is regularly instructed (led and unled) in high-value and complex litigation and arbitrations (both domestic and internationally).

Chinmayi is ranked by the Legal 500 as a ‘Rising Star’ in (i) Commercial Litigation, (ii) International Arbitration, (iii) Energy and (iv) Middle East: The English Bar (Commercial).

She is described in the legal directories as “truly first-rate", "standout" and "a future star of the Bar", who "demonstrates an ability that is well beyond her years". They note, in particular, her intellectual ability (“ferociously intelligent”, “possessing a brilliant analytical mind”, “her legal analysis is exceptional”); forensic rigour (“a superb junior who gets across the details…and forensically drills down into the issues”, “combines razor-sharp attention to detail with forensic rigour”, “the ability to dissect complex and tangled evidence”, “very detailed”), written and oral advocacy (“her abilities to identify precise legal issues and distil these into compelling skeleton arguments or oral submissions are outstanding”, “her written work is superb and she is a skilled advocate”, “her drafting skills are of the highest standard”), commercial judgment (“what stands out is her ability to apply…expertise practically, with full appreciation of the commercial context and the client’s goals”, “clear and commercial advice”) and work ethic and collaborative approach ( “exceptionally hard-working”, “a clever and industrious junior”, “easy to work with”, “works flawlessly as part of a team, but has no hesitation in advocating for her independent views”, “an invaluable member of every team she works on”).

Chinmayi also undertakes her own advocacy, including in interlocutory applications and at trial in the High Court and in arbitral hearings, and has experience cross-examining both factual and expert witnesses. She has acted in arbitrations across major institutional rules, including those of the LCIA, ICC, DIAC, ICSID and SIAC.

Chinmayi also regularly writes on commercial law topics and is a contributor to Damages, Expert Evidence and Valuation in Commercial Disputers in India (2024, Thomson Reuters) (with Rajesh Pillai KC) and the fifth edition of Banking Litigation (upcoming, with Richard Hanke).

Further details of Chinmayi’s experience (including recent and notable instructions) are set out in the sections below.

  • Acted for a Lebanese bank in a claim brought by a middle-eastern businessman seeking a transfer of the funds held with the bank in various US$ and Lebanese-$ denominated currency accounts and arising in the context of the Lebanese financial crisis. Raises jurisdictional questions in respect of a Lebanese law-governed agreement (led by Ian Wilson KC, with Ryan Ferro).
  • Acting for a bank in a claim for the recovery of sums under a guarantee (led by William Edwards).
  • Regularly acting for financial institutions defending Consumer Credit Act 1974 claims including Marks and Spencer Financial Services PLC, Lloyds Bank, HSBC Bank UK Plc, MBNA Limited, Barclays Bank UK Plc.
  • Acting in a US$90m London-seated arbitration arising from the buy-out agreement between the shareholders of an energy company in the Middle East. The claim concerns: contractual claims; claims in deceit, knowing receipt, dishonest assistance and conspiracy; unjust enrichment and breach of fiduciary duties (led by Yash Bheeroo).
  • Horlick & Ors v Cavaco & Ors [2022] EWHC 2935 (KB): successfully acted for the defendants in a 5-day commercial trial (led by Matthew Watson) for a multi-million pound dispute involving claims relating to various loan and fundraising agreements (including claims for the alleged payment of secret commissions).
  • Taqa Bratani Ltd v Fujairah Oil and Gas UK LLC: acting for the defendants in a dispute arising in the context of a joint venture partnership relating to the operation of various oil and gas fields in the Brae complex in the North Sea and in particular, in relation to the declaration of a dividend of US$84 million. This case raised issues under s.238 and s.423 of the Insolvency Act 1986 and unlawful means conspiracy.
  • Acting in a US$90m London-seated arbitration arising from the buy-out agreement between the shareholders of an energy company in the Middle East. The claim concerns: contractual claims; claims in deceit, knowing receipt, dishonest assistance and conspiracy; unjust enrichment and breach of fiduciary duties (led by Yash Bheeroo).
  • Acting for an energy group in a dispute concerning the termination of an agreement for LNG regasification services in a London-seated arbitration (led by Rajesh Pillai KC).
  • URE Energy Limited v. Notting Hill Genesis: a contractual dispute under an electricity-supply contract, which raises issues in respect of waiver by election (and in particular as to when a party has ‘knowledge’ for the purposes of an election), alleged material breaches and the construction of liquidated damages clauses. Chinmayi appeared in a 2-week trial in the Commercial Court ([2024] EWHC 2537) and is due to appear at the appellate stage before the Court of Appeal (led in both instances by Jamie Riley KC).
  • Acting for the respondent state in a dispute under the OIC Investment Agreement concerning the alleged expropriation of a pharmaceutical business (led by Christopher Harris KC, Matthew Watson, Mark Wassouf and Cameron Miles).
  • Acting for a F&B unicorn company in a claim arising from a breach of restrictive covenants under an asset purchase agreement (led by Tariq Baloch).
  • Horlick & Ors v Cavaco & Ors [2022] EWHC 2935 (KB): successfully acted for the defendants in a 5-day commercial trial (led by Matthew Watson) for a multi-million pound dispute relating to Mozambiquan mines involving claims under various loan and fundraising agreements, and for unjust enrichment.
  • Acting for a bank in a claim for the recovery of sums under a guarantee (led by William Edwards).
  • Acted for a Lebanese bank in a claim brought by a middle-eastern businessman seeking a transfer of the funds held with the bank in various US$ and Lebanese-$ denominated currency accounts and arising in the context of the Lebanese financial crisis. Raises jurisdictional questions in respect of a Lebanese law-governed agreement (led by Ian Wilson KC, with Ryan Ferro).
  • Taqa Bratani Ltd v Fujairah Oil and Gas UK LLC: acting for the defendants in a dispute arising in the context of a joint venture partnership relating to the operation of various oil and gas fields in the Brae complex in the North Sea and in particular, in relation to the declaration of a dividend of US$84 million. This case raised issues under s.238 and s.423 of the Insolvency Act 1986 and unlawful means conspiracy.
  • Acted for a Lebanese bank in a claim brought by a middle-eastern businessman seeking a transfer of the funds held with the bank in various US$ and Lebanese-$ denominated currency accounts and arising in the context of the Lebanese financial crisis. Raises jurisdictional questions in respect of a Lebanese law-governed agreement (led by Ian Wilson KC, with Ryan Ferro).
  • Acting in a US$90m London-seated arbitration arising from the buy-out agreement between the shareholders of an energy company in the Middle East. The claim concerns: contractual claims; claims in deceit, knowing receipt, dishonest assistance and conspiracy; unjust enrichment and breach of fiduciary duties (led by Yash Bheeroo).
  • Acting for an energy group in a dispute concerning the termination of an agreement for LNG regasification services in a London-seated arbitration (led by Rajesh Pillai KC).
  • URE Energy Limited v. Notting Hill Genesis: a contractual dispute under an electricity-supply contract, which raises issues in respect of waiver by election (and in particular as to when a party has ‘knowledge’ for the purposes of an election), alleged material breaches and the construction of liquidated damages clauses. Chinmayi appeared in a 2-week trial in the Commercial Court ([2024] EWHC 2537) and is due to appear at the appellate stage before the Court of Appeal (led in both instances by Jamie Riley KC).
  • Horlick & Ors v Cavaco & Ors [2022] EWHC 2935 (KB): successfully acted for the defendants in a 5-day commercial trial (led by Matthew Watson) for a multi-million pound dispute relating to Mozambiquan mines involving claims under various loan and fundraising agreements, and for unjust enrichment.
  • Taqa Bratani Ltd v Fujairah Oil and Gas UK LLC: acting for the defendants in a dispute arising in the context of a joint venture partnership relating to the operation of various oil and gas fields in the Brae complex in the North Sea and in particular, in relation to the declaration of a dividend of US$84 million. This case raised issues under s.238 and s.423 of the Insolvency Act 1986 and unlawful means conspiracy.
  • Involved in an ICSID investor-state arbitration arising out of claims for breach of the Energy Charter Treaty (as Tribunal Assistant).
  • Acting for the respondent state in a dispute under the OIC Investment Agreement concerning the alleged expropriation of a pharmaceutical business (led by Christopher Harris KC, Matthew Watson, Mark Wassouf and Cameron Miles).
  • Involved in an ICSID investor-state arbitration arising out of claims for breach of the Energy Charter Treaty (as Tribunal Assistant).
  • Acting in a US$90m London-seated arbitration arising from the buy-out agreement between the shareholders of an energy company in the Middle East. The claim concerns: contractual claims; claims in deceit, knowing receipt, dishonest assistance and conspiracy; unjust enrichment and breach of fiduciary duties (led by Yash Bheeroo).
  • Acting for a F&B unicorn company in a claim arising from a breach of restrictive covenants under an asset purchase agreement (led by Tariq Baloch).
  • Horlick & Ors v Cavaco & Ors [2022] EWHC 2935 (KB): successfully acted for the defendants in a 5-day commercial trial (led by Matthew Watson) for a multi-million pound dispute relating to Mozambiquan mines involving claims under various loan and fundraising agreements, and for unjust enrichment.
  • Hindi (fluent)
  • Kannada (fluent)
Winner: UK Bar Awards 2025
3VB

3VB

3VB

Advertencia: personas que se hacen pasar por 3VB

3VB tiene conocimiento de que el sitio web 3vb.org ha sido utilizado por personas que se hacían pasar por 3 Verulam Buildings (3VB) y sus abogados (*barristers*), incluso para ofrecer supuestos servicios legales y de recuperación de activos.

El sitio 3vb.org no fue operado ni autorizado por 3VB ni por sus abogados. El sitio web fraudulento está en proceso de ser dado de baja.

Si ha recibido alguna comunicación de alguien que afirma representar a 3VB, le rogamos que la verifique utilizando únicamente los datos de contacto publicados en este sitio web: 3vb.com.

Si ha realizado pagos o ha facilitado información financiera o personal a alguien que utilizaba 3vb.org o que afirmaba representar a 3VB a través de dicho sitio web, no efectúe más pagos y considere denunciar el asunto ante las autoridades competentes de su jurisdicción.

La versión en inglés de este aviso constituye la única declaración oficial de 3VB. La traducción al español que figura a continuación se ha generado mediante inteligencia artificial y se facilita únicamente a título informativo. En caso de discrepancia, prevalecerá la versión en inglés.