Andrew Sutcliffe QC and William Day obtain dismissal in heavily contested insolvency dispute

After a four-day remote trial in May 2020, HHJ Paul Matthews (sitting as a High Court Judge) dismissed the final aspects of the long running insolvency dispute in Brake v Swift and The Chedington Court Estate Limited. Andrew Sutcliffe QC and William Day acted for Chedington instructed by Ian Gatt QC of Stewarts.

The dispute arose out of sales of assets out of the Brakes’ bankruptcies and the liquidation of the related partnership. The issue at trial related to a particular property on an estate in Dorset. The trial judgment ([2020] EWHC 1810 (Ch)) deals with the treatment of property that may fall into partnership liquidation or partner bankruptcy. It is also is likely to become the leading case on section 283A of the Insolvency Act 1986 and the approach to take to a bankrupt’s application for a declaration that property has re-vested in them because it was alleged to be their principal residence at the date of bankruptcy.

Trial was preceded by a number of interlocutory applications from March 2020 by both sides, which saw Andrew Sutcliffe QC and William Day ranked as the joint busiest restructuring and insolvency barristers in the first half of 2020 in The Lawyer litigation tracker. Andrew and William were also successful on all of those interlocutory matters (some of which are now on appeal to the Court of Appeal), which dealt with a number of important points of principle for insolvency applications and more generally:

  • The standing of bankrupts to make applications in their bankruptcies ([2020] EWHC 537 (Ch))
  • The standing of strangers to a liquidation to make applications, and the extent to which their standing can be cured by the support of creditors ([2020] EWHC 538 (Ch))
  • The standing of strangers to an insolvency to respond to an insolvency application ([2020] EWHC 1071 (Ch))
  • The appropriate principles to apply on stay and adjournment applications ([2020] EWHC 694 (Ch))
  • A recusal application for apparent bias ([2020] EWHC 1156 (Ch))
Winner: UK Bar Awards 2025
3VB

3VB

3VB

Advertencia: personas que se hacen pasar por 3VB

3VB tiene conocimiento de que el sitio web 3vb.org ha sido utilizado por personas que se hacían pasar por 3 Verulam Buildings (3VB) y sus abogados (*barristers*), incluso para ofrecer supuestos servicios legales y de recuperación de activos.

El sitio 3vb.org no fue operado ni autorizado por 3VB ni por sus abogados. El sitio web fraudulento está en proceso de ser dado de baja.

Si ha recibido alguna comunicación de alguien que afirma representar a 3VB, le rogamos que la verifique utilizando únicamente los datos de contacto publicados en este sitio web: 3vb.com.

Si ha realizado pagos o ha facilitado información financiera o personal a alguien que utilizaba 3vb.org o que afirmaba representar a 3VB a través de dicho sitio web, no efectúe más pagos y considere denunciar el asunto ante las autoridades competentes de su jurisdicción.

La versión en inglés de este aviso constituye la única declaración oficial de 3VB. La traducción al español que figura a continuación se ha generado mediante inteligencia artificial y se facilita únicamente a título informativo. En caso de discrepancia, prevalecerá la versión en inglés.