Liisa Lahti

Liisa Lahti

Call: 2009

"She is a natural strategist and problem solver. She is my first-choice barrister."

- Chambers & Partners UK Bar (2024)

"A team player with a great work ethic, who is super bright."

- Chambers & Partners UK Bar (2024)

"Clients thoroughly enjoy working with Liisa. She is incredibly smart, dedicated and commercially minded."

- Legal 500 UK Bar (2024)

"Brilliant analytical skills and a superb facility in communicating complex legal concepts to clients."

- Legal 500 UK Bar (2022)

Practice Overview

Liisa’s practice encompasses a broad range of general commercial litigation and arbitration including banking, finance, share and business sales, civil fraud and international trade disputes.

Liisa is ranked as a 'Leading Junior' in Banking & Finance, Commercial Dispute Resolution and International Arbitration in Chambers UK 2024 and as a 'Leading Junior' in Banking & Finance and Civil Fraud in Legal 500 2024.

She has been described in the directories as “a natural strategist and problem solver. … my first-choice barrister", "A team player, great work ethic and is super bright" “… hugely lay client friendly and focused, she is able to swiftly identify the crux of the issues in the dispute while developing other nuanced and complex arguments”, “Very user-friendly, she understands the commercial pressures of the clients that she works with and is an outstanding team player. Clients thoroughly enjoy working with Liisa. She is incredibly smart, dedicated and commercially minded”, “hardworking, driven and diligent … with excellent powers of analysis and good judgement. Her written work is first rate, and she has impressive skills with clients and instructing solicitor teams”, “a rising star who is extremely well liked”, “extremely responsive and watertight in her legal arguments", "an outstanding barrister, she is exceptionally hard-working and has excellent commercial instincts.”

Before coming to the Bar, Liisa qualified as a solicitor at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer. Since coming to the Bar, Liisa has been seconded in-house at an international group P&I Club, the General Counsel’s Division of the (then) FSA and a leading international law firm.

Liisa is instructed across a broad spectrum of banking and finance work. Particular areas of expertise include swaps and derivatives disputes, cases involving allegations of interest rate benchmark manipulation and cases concerning online payment fraud.

Examples include:

  • Farol & Ors v Clydesdale Bank & National Australia Bank [2024] EWHC 593 (Ch). Acting for the Claimants in a 12-week trial about the bank’s entitlement to charge certain amounts as break costs upon the early repayment of its fixed rate tailored business loans (with Andrew Onslow KC and Lisa Lacob).
  • Acting for a bank in defence of claims relating to vishing and cyber-attacks on customers of the bank (2016-present) (with Raymond Cox KC of Fountain Court and as sole counsel).
  • Advising customers of banks whose accounts have been frozen or payments stopped due to concerns about sanctions.
  • Inter-City Properties and others v Lloyds Bank Plc (Chancery Division) (with Stephen Auld KC of One Essex Court) – Claims relating to mis-selling of interest rate swaps and LIBOR manipulation. Allegations of breach of contract and misrepresentation, including fraudulent misrepresentation.
  • Aldersgate & Ors v Bank of Scotland & Anor [2018] EWHC 2601 (Comm) (with Stephen Auld KC of One Essex Court) – Four claims (heard concurrently) in excess of £100 million. Allegations of fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation arising out of LIBOR manipulation as well as ancillary issues as to the status of findings by global regulators and attempts to withdraw pleaded admissions.
  • HMG Investment Holdings Limited v National Westminster Bank PLC [2018] EWHC 3492 (Comm) (with Richard Edwards KC of 3 Verulam Buildings) – Multi-million £ claim for mis-selling of interest rate hedging products. Gave rise to questions/issues concerning misrepresentation, the quantification of consequential loss and the law concerning contractual estoppel/basis clauses.
  • Secure Capital SA v Credit Suisse AG [2015] EWHC 388 (Comm), [2017] EWCA Civ 1486 (with Raymond Cox KC of Fountain Court) – dispute concerning contingent longevity bearer notes cleared through Clearsteam. Claim for breach of the terms of the notes. Questions concerning the law applicable to the claim.
  • A dispute (LCIA arbitration) between customer and issuer of structured FX derivatives – issues concerning the true construction of representations in the ISDA Master Agreement, estoppel and the law of India regulating derivatives.
  • LCIA Arbitration of issues relating to the financial arrangements surrounding the sale of four vessels. Issues included contractual estoppel and the law on penalty clauses (with Steven Gee KC Monckton Chambers).
  • Diag Human SE v Czech Republic (Commercial Court, 2013-14) [2014] EWHC 1639 (Comm) and [2013] EWHC 3190 (Comm) – Arbitration award enforcement action in English Commercial Court against sovereign state, including by way of third-party debt order over sovereign bond payments through banks in London and Luxembourg. Enforcement action reported at [2014] EWHC 1639 (Comm). Additional question of whether security for costs is available to an award debtor in an enforcement action reported at [2013] EWHC 3190 (Comm).
  • Acting for a major international law firm conducting a s.166 FSMA Skilled Person’s review into the mis-selling of IRHPs and consequential losses.
  • Advising a consortium of banks (as sole counsel) on ways of enforcing security in circumstances where buyers were in default under a shipbuilding contract – outstanding sums exceeding USD 10 million.

Liisa has a busy general commercial litigation practice encompassing advisory and advocacy work across a broad range of commercial disputes.

Examples include the following:

  • Ongoing ICC arbitration concerning the share sale of an energy company (as sole counsel). Issues include the construction of the share purchase agreement and the inter-relationship between the relevant contractual documentation and claims based on unjust enrichment. The amounts in dispute exceed $60 million.
  • Argentum Exploration Limited v The Silver [2024] UKSC 16 – Represented (at first instance, in the Court of Appeal and in the Supreme Court) Argentum Exploration, the salvors of 2364 bars of silver recovered from the (historic) wreck of the SS TILAWA in the first ever case to consider s 10(4)(a) of the State Immunity Act 1978 (with Stephen Hofmeyr KC of 7KBW and Cameron Miles).
  • Acting as sole counsel in proceedings alleging a breach of a contract for the sale of several thousand tonnes of undelivered orange juice by-product (judgment awaited after a one-week trial in 2024).
  • Acting (with Ali Malek KC) for a claimant software company in a claim brought against former directors for negligence and breach of fiduciary duty.
  • PBO v (1) DONPRO and others [2021] EWHC 1951 (Comm) – Acting as sole counsel in a successful challenge to a trade arbitration award under section 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996. The case is a rare example of a successful challenge to a discretionary procedural decision by a tribunal.
  • Dispute relating to alleged verbal agreement amending a written exclusive agency agreement. Issues also included allegations of charges based on falsified invoices (arbitration in 2019).
  • Acting (with Lionel Persey KC and Paul Henton of Quadrant Chambers) for the claimants in a $ multi-million arbitration (UNCITRAL) arising out of a joint venture between Finnish and Bahraini interests for the production and marketing of lubricant base oils at a hydrocracker plant.
  • PST Energy 7 Shipping LLC v OW Bunker Malta Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 1058, [2016] UKSC 23 – Acting for various Owners (arbitration and court, including the Supreme Court) in relation to claims arising from the insolvency of OW Bunkers. Issues include the relationship between retention of title clauses and claims for the price of goods (with Jonathan Crow KC of 4 Stone Buildings and as sole counsel).

Many of the cases Liisa has worked on have involved international elements, and she has extensive experience of conflicts of law issues including issues concerning conflicting arbitration and jurisdiction clauses and the jurisdiction of the English courts to grant a freezing injunction.

Liisa has experience of all kinds of arbitration disputes including under ICC, LCIA, UNCITRAL and LMAA rules, under trade associations such as GAFTA and FOSFA and ad hoc arbitrations. She also regularly advises on the enforcement of arbitration awards under the New York Convention and otherwise with particular expertise in state immunity issues. Examples include:

  • An ongoing ICC arbitration relating to the share sale of an energy company. The amounts in dispute exceed $60 million (as sole counsel).
  • Acting as sole counsel in a successful challenge to a trade arbitration award under section 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996: PBO v (1) DONPRO and others [2021] EWHC 1951 (Comm). The case is a rare example of a successful challenge to a discretionary procedural decision by a tribunal.
  • An LCIA arbitration relating to the sale of wind turbines in the Ukraine (as sole counsel).
  • Acting (with Lionel Persey KC and Paul Henton of Quadrant Chambers) for the claimants in a $ multi-million arbitration (UNCITRAL) arising out of a joint venture between Finnish and Bahraini interests for the production and marketing of lubricant base oils at a hydrocracker plant.
  • Arbitration (2019) concerning allegations of invoice fraud and breaches of an alleged exclusive agency agreement (as sole counsel).
  • Arbitration relating to an alleged wrongful call on a Warranty Bond provided in the context of a shipbuilding contract (as sole counsel).
  • Proceedings in the Commercial Court resisting enforcement of a declaratory award under section 66 English Arbitration Act 1996 (as junior to James Turner KC of Quadrant Chambers).
  • Proceedings in the Commercial Court concerning the enforcement of an arbitration award worth over £150 million against the Czech Republic – issues concerning (among other things) state immunity and the availability of security for costs in the context of enforcement proceedings (security for costs application Diag Human SE v Czech Republic [2013] EWHC 3190 (Comm), enforcement hearing reported at [2014] EWHC 1639 (Comm) – with Raymond Cox KC of Fountain Court).

Liisa’s cases often involve allegations of fraud and dishonesty, ranging from forged instruments to fraudulent misrepresentation and deceit. She also has experience of urgent applications for interim relief, such as freezing injunctions. Illustrative examples include:

  • Acting for the bank in defence of claims relating to vishing and cyber-attacks on customers of the bank (2016-present) (with Raymond Cox KC of Fountain Court and as sole counsel).
  • Acting for the respondent in an appeal against a judgment finding an individual in contempt of court and sentencing her to a suspended sentence of six months’ imprisonment (Farrer and Co LLP v Meyer [2022] EWCA Civ 706, as sole counsel).
  • Acting in proceedings resisting an Order sought pursuant to the Evidence (Proceedings in Other Jurisdictions) Act 1975 for disclosure of documents said to relate to an alleged fraud on companies owned by a sovereign wealth fund (Sakab Saudi Holding Co v Al Jabri [2021] EWHC 3390 (QB), with Matt Parker KC).
  • Various disputes (and advisory work) concerning allegations of invoice fraud including acting in two arbitrations relating to invoice fraud in 2019 and applications for Norwich Pharmacal relief.
  • Claim in excess of £100 million. Allegations of fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation arising out of LIBOR manipulation as well as an application by the defendant attempting to withdraw pleaded admissions of findings by global regulators (Aldersgate & Ors v Bank of Scotland & Anor [2018] EWHC 2601 (Comm)).
  • A freezing injunction application in respect of payment made under Sovereign medium term €10bn issue of notes.

Liisa has considerable experience in shipping, commodities and other international trade matters. She has acted in a wide range of disputes concerning contracts of affreightment and the international sale of goods. Examples include:

  • Argentum Exploration Limited v The Silver [2024] UKSC 16 acting (at first instance, in the Court of Appeal and in the Supreme Court) for Argentum Exploration, the Salvors of 2364 bars of silver recovered from the (historic) wreck of the SS TILAWA in the first ever case to consider s 10(4)(a) of the State Immunity Act 1978. (with Stephen Hofmeyr KC of 7KBW and Cameron Miles).
  • Acting as sole counsel in proceedings alleging a breach of a contract for the sale of several thousand tonnes of undelivered orange juice by-product (judgment awaited after a one-week trial in 2024).
  • LMAA Arbitration relating to damaged cargo (with Guy Blackwood KC of Quadrant Chambers).
  • PBO v (1) DONPRO and others [2021] EWHC 1951 (Comm).
  • Acting as sole counsel in a successful challenge to a trade arbitration award under section 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996. The case is a rare example of a successful challenge to a discretionary procedural decision by a tribunal.
  • PST Energy 7 Shipping LLC v OW Bunker Malta Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 1058, [2016] UKSC 23 – Acting for various Owners (arbitration and court, including the Supreme Court) in relation to claims arising from the insolvency of OW Bunkers. Issues included the relationship between retention of title clauses and claims for the price of goods (with Jonathan Crow KC of 4 Stone Buildings and as sole counsel).

Recent experience includes the following:

  • Freezing injunction application in respect of payments made under a sovereign medium term €10bn issue of notes.
  • Injunction application in support of arbitral proceedings. Issues concerning the meaning of “assets” under section 44(3) of the Arbitration Act 1996.
  • Advising on the merits of an application to set aside an anti-suit injunction obtained by a bank in connection with sums due under complex “exotic” derivatives where the contractual terms provided for LCIA arbitration in England.
  • Advising on the merits of an application to set aside a freezing injunction for (inter alia) material non-disclosure and abuse of process and ability to recover under the cross-undertaking in damages.
  • Drafting documents for a freezing injunction application against persons unknown in the context of online fraud.
Winner: UK Bar Awards 2023
The Lawyer Awards 2022: Chambers of the Year