3VB’s Finance Column: Richard Hanke writes for Practical Law on manifest error clauses

In a new article for Practical Law, Richard Hanke analyses the Court of Appeal’s decision in WH Holding Limited v London Stadium LLP [2026] EWCA Civ 153, examining the key clarifications it provides on the meaning of “manifest error” and how parties can draft contracts to reduce the scope for disputes. The article considers the Court’s approach to challenging expert determinations, explains the distinction between an error and a manifest error, and highlights practical drafting considerations for parties seeking greater certainty in contractual dispute resolution.

Richard specialises in commercial litigation, in particular banking, commercial fraud, general contractual disputes, financial services regulation and professional negligence. He has been recommended for many years in the legal directories as a leading junior for Banking & Finance, Commercial Litigation and Professional Negligence.

Read the full article here: Manifesting grounds for challenge.

This article was first published by Practical Law in April 2026.